/ Politics
Fed’s future in the air after Trump takes aim at Powell… again

Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images
President Donald Trump said he would move to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday if he does not step down from the Board of Governors when his term ends next month.
While former chairs usually step down from the Fed’s Board of Governors after their term ends, Powell is technically allowed to stay on the board until 2028.
Things are getting a bit complicated
Powell recently said he has “no intention” of leaving until the Justice Department’s investigation into the Fed’s $2.5 billion headquarters renovation is complete, and claimed the probe is a pressure campaign by Trump to push the central bank to lower interest rates.
Since that point:
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) has also said he will block Donald Trump’s nominee to replace Jerome Powell, Kevin Warsh, until the investigation is complete.
Meanwhile, Trump seemed willing to let Tillis block Warsh’s confirmation instead of backing off the probe, which intensified after prosecutors made a surprise visit to the Fed construction site this week.
So, what happens now? While Warsh’s confirmation hearing is set for next Tuesday, the Supreme Court could rule on the president’s power to remove Fed officials as soon as today.
Why should you care?
Uncertainty around Fed leadership could influence increase market volitility and, notably, interest rate decisions, meaning Americans might see unpredictable changes in borrowing costs for things like mortgages, credit cards, and car loans.
/ Government
Americans are increasingly trying to scam the IRS

Designed by NextGen News
After a series of significant staffing cuts at the Internal Revenue Service, tax professionals claim more and more filers are falsifying their returns, betting that there is a lower chance they’ll be caught.
Well, is there?
In the last year, the agency has shed thousands of workers in enforcement roles responsible for audits and collections, largely due to long-term funding cuts and the clawback of previous funding increases:
At the start of last year, the IRS had around 102,000 employees, but after layoffs and buyouts, that number dropped to about 74,000, the lowest since 2019.
Congress has rolled back nearly all of the $45.6 billion in long-term tax enforcement funding from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, cutting it to about $300 million by late 2025.
Tax experts warn that the budget pressures (and the resulting staff declines) could exacerbate already falling audits, especially for high-income individuals and complex businesses.
They’ve already been dropping for a decade: The IRS conducted a record low 497,541 audits last year, a steep drop from the 1.7 million annual average seen during the early 2010s.
Many see that as an opportunity
The mix of layoffs, buyouts, and budget cuts has contributed to a growing perception among some taxpayers that enforcement is weakening, leaving some to hope the agency is too understaffed to catch them:
Tax professionals reported a “vibe shift,” as more individuals and firms are willing to take questionable tax positions.
Estimates suggest the government could lose hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue over time if compliance continues to decline.
Welp, at least we have better returns: Tax refunds are a bit higher this year, as new deductions from Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” have increased the average refund by 11% to $3,462.
Why is this important?
Shrinking IRS enforcement, and the resulting confidence among those who feel they can exploit it, can lead to a larger tax gap and ultimately shift more of the burden onto honest taxpayers through higher taxes or reduced government services.
/ Economy
The “annoyance economy” is making companies rich

Designed by NextGen News
A growing share of everyday interactions, like dealing with subscription cancellations, billing issues, spam, or robocalls, has become intentionally more difficult, a trend some experts call the “annoyance economy.”
It’s costing you money
Researchers estimate these frustrations have cost Americans about $165 billion annually in wasted time and extra fees, and while some of these nuisances result from outdated systems and regulations, others are there on purpose.
According to a report by the progressive Groundwork Collaborative:
Making cancellations more difficult helped companies earn between 14% to 200% more in revenue.
Junk fees, which are hidden, unexpected, or deceptive charges, cost consumers over $90 billion per year alone.
Time spent on the phone with customer service is up 60% over the past 20 years.
How do companies profit from this? Instead of optimizing for convenience, many businesses have intentionally added small annoyances that wear consumers out. Each of those inconveniences provides a monetization opportunity (think unskippable ads, baggage fees, or paying for faster service).
It’s a universally hated practice: According to polling by Data for Progress, 75% of voters say they’re fed up with surprise junk fees from airlines, hotels, ticket vendors, and more, while over 80% of respondents say they are frustrated by constant spam calls and text messages. See the best ways to avoid spam texts here.
Why does this matter?
The rise of the “annoyance economy” means many of us are effectively paying a hidden tax, not just in fees, but in lost time spent dealing with customer service, cancellations, and paperwork. Experts warn the trend is creating broader consequences, like reduced trust in institutions and even delayed or avoided services like medical care (where administrative tasks alone account for tens of billions of dollars in lost time each year).
In partnership with BELAY
AUM Doesn’t Grow in Your Inbox
Your highest-value work is advising, not administrating. But many advisors still spend too much time in their inbox, coordinating details, chasing tasks, and keeping operations moving. That is not just frustrating, it is expensive. BELAY’s free Financial Advisor’s Delegation Guide helps you spot where time is leaking, where support would help most, and how smarter delegation can free you up for clients, strategy, and revenue-generating work.
/ Health & Medicine
The FDA might make peptides easier to get

Getty Images
The Food and Drug Administration is weighing whether to ease restrictions on several peptide-based treatments, a group of compounds that have gained popularity in fitness, wellness, and anti-aging circles.
Should they do it?
It’s complicated. While regulated peptides are generally considered safe and effective (see overview), injectable or ingestible variants, especially for bodybuilding or weight loss, often fall in a gray area:
In 2023, the FDA banned pharmacies from producing certain peptides, leading most of the treatments to be sold online through an unregulated market.
This led to a wave of DIY treatment sourced from sketchy vendors, which often carry impurities or incorrect doses that can lead to harmful side effects like muscle paralysis and sepsis.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has publicly advocated for expanding access to peptides, calling himself a supporter of their potential benefits, though he referred to the deregulation of them as “substandard.”
Looking forward: The FDA said Wednesday it will hold a panel vote on the measure in July, with a second meeting planned to consider reinstating five additional peptides, though no date has been set.
Why should you care?
If the FDA decides to ease restrictions, it would make the treatments more accecable and move most peptide use out of the black market and into regulated settings. However, not all peptides being considered have been fully tested for safety or effectiveness, such as the healing compound BPC-157, which could raise risks.
/ Aviation
The world might soon have a new biggest airline

Tayfun Coskun / Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby reportedly raised the idea of a potential merger with American Airlines during discussions with Trump administration officials, several outlets reported this week.
Super-merger
If pursued, the combination of the two rivals (which together control over 40% of the US market) would create the single largest airline in the world and strip Delta of its long-held revenue crown.
However, the deal would almost certainly face significant antitrust scrutiny. So why consider it?
A merger, in theory, could cut costs at a time when rising prices have put pressure on profitability and ticket pricing.
It could also assist the airlines in navigating economic uncertainty brought by geopolitical events, like the conflict in Iran.
Perhaps most important of all… it would help the airlines compete internationally. The majority of long-haul flights to and from the US are offered by foreign airlines, even though 60% of the flyers are Americans.
So could a deal get done? Well, considering the deal isn’t really even a deal yet, as no talks are in progress, it’s hard to say. However, experts don’t think regulators will greenlight the deal unless the airlines give up a lot of overlapping routes… and there are hundreds of them.
Why is this important?
Industry observers warn that a potential merger between United and American Airlines could reduce competition in the airline industry, which often leads to higher ticket prices and fewer flight options.
How did you like today's newsletter?
/ Fast Facts
Catch up on this week’s weird news

Giphy
> Meta is reportedly building an AI clone of Mark Zuckerberg that employees can talk to, specifically trained on his voice and thinking patterns to help answer questions.
> Colombia has approved a controversial plan to kill dozens of Pablo Escobar’s “cocaine hippos” that were contained in his private zoo (see photos), following years of failed attempts to control their rapidly growing population.
> Scientists have discovered that sperm whales use a kind of “phonetic alphabet” with vowel-like sounds, showing striking similarities to how human language is structured.
> Rolls-Royce, Ferrari, and Bugatti are now selling invite-only, ultra-exclusive cars you can’t even see before buying. Not to worry, your invite probably ended up in your spam folder.
> Timothée Chalamet’s viral comment that “no one cares” about opera and ballet inadvertently helped boost the art forms’ popularity, with millions of social media interactions and a spike in ticket sales.
> A new genetic study suggests Christopher Columbus may have been a Spanish nobleman from Galicia, challenging the long-held belief that he was a humble sailor from Italy.





