The Justice Department has unveiled charges for hundreds of individuals accused of participating in healthcare fraud schemes that allegedly involved more than $6.5 billion in false claims.

Officials described the operation as the largest coordinated action in its history and the second-largest amount ever charged in a single operation.

Authorities say the alleged schemes took many forms, from fake medical claims and illegal payments to questionable telehealth services and opioid-related offenses, all aimed at extracting money from healthcare programs.

How did they do it? According to investigators, many of the plots used Medicare, Medicaid, and other government-funded healthcare programs to pay for treatments that were never provided, prescribe unnecessary medical equipment, or use stolen patient information to submit fraudulent claims. Read how the DOJ stopped the effort here.

It’s linked to a general pushback: The two-week operation is part of the Trump administration’s broader campaign against fraud. Experts estimate healthcare fraud costs the United States between $100 billion and $170 billion each year, or roughly 3% to 15% of total healthcare spending.

Explore a nationwide dashboard of healthcare fraud investigations and cases.

Why is this important? The DOJ's record crackdown could save taxpayers billions by preventing money from being siphoned through fraudulent claims. It could also reduce costs, like insurance premiums, that have been driven up across the system due to excess fraud.

Investors are dumping AI like it’s an estranged ex. A global sell-off in tech wiped out hundreds of billions of dollars in market value earlier this week, signaling that traders have become more concerned about the long-term profitability of AI.

What began as a wave of AI-related selling in the US on Monday quickly turned into a global phenomenon, moving across Asian markets before circling back to the US in the next trading session:

It was a smack in the face for Korea: The market had become one of the world's strongest performers (see short video) thanks to massive demand for companies like Samsung and chipmaker SK Hynix, which both fell more than 12%.

After months of rapid gains and unprecedented investment, the decline reflects a growing loss of confidence in AI-driven growth. But why lose confidence now?

Our News+ members received additional context on why the sell-off is happening (and why it might continue). To get our full briefings with deeper analysis going forward, subscribe below.

This topic is also tracked in our Watchlist, where members can follow its status, momentum, and other developments as they evolve.

The rising cost of living has rippled through nearly every corner of the economy in recent years. Now, it's affecting more than household budgets, but also reshaping how young adults approach dating.

Higher costs for housing, food, transportation, and entertainment have made dating more expensive, leading some young people to prioritize financial stability before serious relationships.

According to a new survey highlighted by Bloomberg:

Finding love has a cost: According to BMO Financial Group, the average cost of a date (which includes transportation, dining, grooming, and more) reached $189, a 12.5% increase from last year. That rise vastly outpaced the 2.7% inflation rate held over the same period.

So, what are young people doing about it? Rather than giving up on love altogether, many young adults are adapting by choosing lower-cost activities and being more open about financial concerns (assuming their date doesn’t mind that). Expensive dinners and nights out are more and more being replaced by coffee dates, outdoor activities, and other budget-friendly options.

How does this affect you? Seeing as Gen Z faces some of the highest housing and living costs relative to income of any recent generation, dating has largely become an afterthought. As this “dateflation” threatens to permanently delay major life milestones, it could reshape the long-term makeup of American households.

Your inbox is full. Slack is piling up. Client messages need a response yesterday. Typing thoughtful replies to all of it takes hours you don't have.

Wispr Flow turns your voice into clean, professional text you can send the moment you stop talking. Speak like you would to a colleague — tangents and all — and get polished output. Emails, Slack, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, whatever's open.

89% of messages sent with zero edits. Used by teams at OpenAI, Vercel, and Clay. Works on Mac, Windows, and iPhone.

Try Wispr Flow free

President Trump canceled a planned signing ceremony for a landmark housing affordability bill, saying he will not sign it until Congress passes another piece of legislation that would tighten voting requirements.

The housing bill, known as the Road to Housing Act, is considered one of the most important home construction bills since 1990.

The Road to Housing Act moved quickly through Congress, passing the Senate on Monday and the House on Tuesday, and was expected to receive President Donald Trump’s signature soon after:

After months of negotiations, lawmakers finally reached an agreement on the housing bill this week, looking for a rare bipartisan legislative victory ahead of the midterm elections.

However, the bill will likely pass anyway: Even if President Trump doesn’t sign the bill, it will automatically become law after 10 days (unless Trump vetoes it). In the event that he does, supporters appear to have enough votes in Congress to override it.

While homeowners or renters won’t notice a reduction in housing costs immediately, many experts say it’ll gradually improve affordability by…

Only our News+ members saw how the bill will improve housing affordability, its direct impact on Americans, and potential downsides. To get our full briefings with additional context, analysis, and impacts going forward, subscribe below.

This topic is also tracked in our Watchlist, where members can follow its status, momentum, and other developments as they evolve.

A Wall Street Journal investigation found that prediction market Polymarket used fake bets, a fake website, and an army of influencers to make exploitative ads that targeted Americans.

Influencers featured across Polymarket’s ad campaigns flaunted up to $900,000 in winnings on the platform, but it turns out, the biggest apparent winners weren't actually winning anything at all.

The WSJ found that if those same exact bets had been placed, a user would have lost around $166,000. So how did Polymarket fool everyone?

The cherry on top? According to documents reviewed by the WSJ, content distributors were only paid if the majority of their audience was located in the US, where Polymarket isn’t legally allowed to operate.

Why is this important? The scheme is a stark reminder that lucrative winnings flaunted around by social media influencers often don’t reflect reality and, at worst, are deliberately misleading ad campaigns to entice a younger, more malleable audience.

> A group of two researchers discovered a new species of Australian spider capable of launching ants into the air at extreme speeds, generating acceleration about 15 times greater than that typically experienced by fighter jet pilots.

> New data shows that younger generations appear to be aging biologically faster than previous generations, a trend that may help explain the rise in cancers diagnosed before age 50.

> A citizen scientist uncovered a 4,000-year-old bow-and-arrow-shaped radio galaxy after seeing the unusual object hidden among astronomical data. Explore NASA’s citizen scientist program here.

> Researchers found that laughter is controlled by two separate brain systems, one responsible for spontaneous, emotional laughter (known as belly laughing) and another that produces the more controlled chuckles common in conversation.

> A town crier in Australia has been crowned the world’s loudest person after hitting 122.4 decibels, proving old-fashioned public announcements can still make serious noise.